Many thanks to the 200+ hardy souls who attended the Community Meeting
The meeting went really well - other than the air-con deciding it was not going to work. We all learnt alot. Special Thank-you to councillors Amanda Stone, Jackie Fristacky, Steve Jolly and Danae Bosler for attending, answering questions and even giving us a hand to try and get the air-con going.
Thank-you also to Candidates Kathleen Maltzahn (Greens) and Hershel Landes (Independent) who attended and addressed the meeting.
Thank-you to Daniel Epstein, our planning barrister for 26-56 who also spoke. He confirmed many a planning barrister's overseas holidays and mortgages were funded by long winded discussions on what "preferred" means. He suggested getting as many of the controls as possible expressed as mandatory - to give certainty and avoid trips to VCAT.
Last but definitely not least, after a big week of preparation, a huge thank-you to all of youwho magiced all the chairs away and the room back exactly how it was, when the meeting was over - just awesome :-)
Below there are more links than you can point a fork stick at - apologies.
If you only want to click on one - try the Download C231 Submission Starter. It can get you going on your submission. Glen's presentation, with speakers notes, is also there to download - pick your format.
Please put in a submission - if you put in a submission the council has to inform you across each stage of the process, including the planning panel as well. Any submission qualifies, there is no minimum length :-)
At this stage in the process numbers matter - we are really trying to convince the council officers to re-consider, in particular, whether the controls for the heritage shopping strip should allow visible built form over the heritage shops.
The PFN contention is the ability to see the heritage shop parapets against the sky from the other side of the road is intrinsic to the heritage, we are in theory protecting, so to protect the heritage experience this must be the control.
Submissions must be received by the City Of Yarra planning department by 5pm on Friday 30th November.
Links to C231 Planning Documentation
Links to The PFN Meeting Material
Plan Melbourne 2050 -
The strategy plan for all of Melbourne - the state govt planning policy - states in directive 5.1.2
local communities should lead the planning of their own centres.
Not contribute, lead. Its up to each of us to take this opportunity to inform the council, then the panel, what should and should not be built in our Queens Parade.
The fight to save Queens Parade from inappropriate development has reached the critical final rounds.
Council is seeking to secure planning controls that will provide greater certainty about the scale of future development in Queens Parade. Permanent controls are overdue and welcome. What is not welcome is the proposed heights - 6 storeys above the shops, and 14 storeys in other locations.
Yarra now has the final proposed built-form controls for Queens Parade - Planning Scheme Amendment C231 - on exhibition for public comment & submission. The closing date for submissions has been extended to Friday November 30th.
Council issued a letter to residents about the process for submissions..If you felt confused as to its content and unsure how to make an informed submission to Council, you are not alone!
Protect Fitzroy North is hosting a public meeting on Monday 19 November to demystify the C231 Amendment and to:
- explain the proposed planning scheme amendment in plain English
- explain how to make a submission, and the importance of doing so
- explain the process ahead and how to be involved
- answer questions and let residents raise their concerns
As with the former Gasworks site, it’s now time for the community to have its say on crucial matters such as:
- should heights of up to 6 storeys be allowed above the heritage shopfronts?
- how obtrusive should new additions above heritage shopfronts be permitted to be?
- should heights of 7, 10 and 14 storeys be allowed elsewhere?
- is the extent of the proposed heritage protection adequate?
- should new developments be allowed to direct traffic through existing heritage laneways?
- the scale, look and form of new in-fill development
This may be our last statutory opportunity to have a say on what permanent planning and built-form controls should apply to Queens Parade. Our community can make a difference - we did just that on the Gasworks site, and to very significant effect.
Unlike Gasworks, this is not about a piece of land with a toxic legacy, but about the future of the much-loved Queens Parade shops and precinct - a unique heritage jewel. The cranes have already moved in and concrete block-houses are appearing in the skyline.
Queens Parade is beautiful but it can’t speak - so we must speak for it. Join us at Bargoonga Nganjin Community Room (North Fitzroy Library - 182 St Georges Road North Fitzroy) on Monday the 19th of November at 7:00pm to lend your voice to Queens Parade.
Never put in a submission - no worries - a Submission 101 Starter Guide will be available on the night, and downloadable via this webpage after the meeting ( still working on it :-)
Make no mistake, this is the most important battle yet. Put the date in your diary now. Be there on the night. Help protect Queens Parade.
Latest News : Chalk up two more for the good guys :-)
Monster behind Mosskito
Refused by Council Officers
Yarra planning refused the proposal on fairly comprehensive shopping list of failures on most of the applicable sections of the planning scheme.
Heritage (too dominant), Planning (too high, too close), Urban Design (too big, bad fit), ESD (too hot, too dark) and Apartment Amenity (too pokey)
Victory at VCAT
Congratulations to the committed crew of the Alphington Fairfield Appropriate Development Association (AFADA), and the West Alphington Residents Association, who with the council leading the charge had a super win at VCAT.
The councillors agreed with the residents. A condition requiring this development should not exceed five storeys was imposed by the council and _upheld_ at VCAT.
VCAT agreed with the council and residents. While they thought Heidelberg road could cope with significant height, the proposal was clearly excessive for a site with low rise heritage neighbours, andquiet streets on two other sides.
Gasworks The Next Steps - Summary
The new portal for the Fitzroy Gasworks engagement is open : http://www.development.vic.gov.au/projects/fitzroy
Link to Video from Richard Wynne with even more on the Gasworks Project - includes some great historical shots
More Information on the Gasworks Page - accessible via the page menu above the banner.
The Monster on Moonlight
622-642 Nicholson Street North Fitzroy
Live in North Fitzroy/North Carlton/Clifton Hill ?
Please Consider Objecting
A developer is proposing a 42 metre high monster beside two residential complexes, currently home to more than 150 people in North Fitzroy. These new residents have embraced living in a higher density community, in a precinct zoned as mixed use, as encouraged in both municipal and state policy.
Then an application like this comes along. A 42 metre monolith with a late night bottle shop and supermarket, serviced by delivery and garbage trucks from 7am, 6 days a week. Quiet enjoyment of your home - gone. Safe access to your home - gone. Privacy - gone. Neighbourhood character - gone. Traffic on Nicholson Street - worse.
The residents support a Medical centre and commercial offices, provided the building fits the scale of the neighbourhood, and respects the amenity of the neighbours. The excessive height, bulk and the endless trucks are totally inconsistent with a good planning outcome for this site.
Why put in an objection ? I live streets away.
This proposed mixed use zone development, if approved, will set a diabolical precedent for all commercial and residential properties near tram lines or major arterial roads, particularly away from Neighbourhood or Major Activity Centres.
There are other negative aspects to this development, like minimum Sustainability standards, Ned-Kelly bike racks, limited activation at ground level, another late night bottle shop, but these pale before the toxic amenity and neighbourhood character impact.
So far nothing this bad has been approved in the City of Yarra north of Alexandra Parade. Without a loud and clear mandate from the community, the council is in a weaker negotiating position when talking to the developer, and at VCAT.
Why put in an objection ? I live nearby, the council will take care of it.
Objections from the neighbours have the biggest impact - one way or the other.
Planning is set up to favour the developer, so if you do not oppose a development, you are considered to be _ok_ with the proposed plans. Every close neighbour who does not object is a win for the developer.
The council has limited resources, and many major projects to assess, so the council is not going to spend precious resources opposing proposals the neighbours do not object to. VCAT take into account the level of opposition, and planning issues raised by the neighbours. Without the neighbours objections the council has a much weaker case at VCAT.
The reverse is also true. If there is a strong body of objections from the people most effected by the development, then the council must address the objections raised by residents. If there is a strong set of planning issues raised by neighbours, and ideally the wider community, the council officers are in a stronger negotiating position when discussing possible improvements with the developer. The council's case is also stronger at VCAT.
How can I put in an objection ?
You can type your objection in the provided on-line form or as a file attachment - via the City Of Yarra page for this development application. (click thru link above - its orange)
You can also send in your objection as a letter to the planning department - remember to include the application number PLN18/0172.
You don't have to quote the planning scheme clauses. You just need to say, in your own words, what you object to personally, the impact it will have on you and yours. The officers will know which parts of the planning scheme apply for each of your issues.
It is worth remembering all objections are public documents. They are not published on-line but they can be read by anyone who asks to see them at the town hall (including the developer)
1. Toxic Amenity Impact on neighbours.
This is by far the worst aspect of this development. In principle a development should minimise its negative impact on the amenity of its neighbours, strive to contain any negative community impact within the site boundaries. This speaks to the common law principles underpinning planning law and to orderly planning.
This proposal is distinguished by how, this development, is designed to dump all its negative impacts, out of the site and on its neighbours. The moonlight site gets to be the biggest building and monopolise the laneway. The neighbouring residential complexes get the loss of pleasant outlook, the loss of sunlight, the loss of the reasonable expectation of quiet enjoyment, the loss of clean air, the loss of privacy, the loss of relatively safe pedestrian and cycle access, the loss of safe and available car access.
Truck Traffic - Access and Safety
Trucks will use the entire width of Bik Lane when turning into this narrow ROW. The other Bik Lane users, all the Roi apartments and the all the warehouses behind "moonlight", will have their access blocked by these trucks.
Roi Apartments and the warehouses rely on Bik Lane for all access, pedestrian and cycle access as well as vehicles. This entire block is a Mixed Use zone. It is not safe, if the only pedestrian access, is shared with large Delivery and Garbage Trucks. Would you like your children walking to school, down a path with supermarket delivery trucks ?
Truck Noise and Pollution
The developer's export acoustic report says every truck entering, and every truck idling while waiting, will exceed the level allowed under SEPP-N1. The noise will be even worse due to idling refrigerated trucks running a freezer and engine.
The acoustic report author, is satisfied it is entirely acceptable, from 7 am, 6 days a week, to have four trucks an hour, to drive in and idle, under the windows of the Roi apartments. Entirely acceptable, despite the fact every one of these delivery/garbage trucks, whether idling or driving or loading will exceed the permitted noise levels.
Diesel fumes are a known carcinogen. Bik Lane is narrow, so it will take time to naturally disperse diesel fumes on windless days. Four trucks an hour idling will generate a lot of diesel fumes. Apartments beside those idling trucks with air-conditioners on the balcony will draw the diesel fumes into the apartments.
Who will guarantee trucks will not arrive before 7am ? Who will open and close the loading door for each truck ? Who will stop trucks filling the lane and sitting there idling ? Truck entry should only be off Nicholson Street, or even better yet, don't include a commercial use needing large trucks to visit every day.
There was no expert evidence included in the application to explain how the health, safety and quality of life for the residents of the Roi apartments is enhanced by diesel fumes and truck noise belching in their window 6 days a week.
SomePlanning Scheme references :
SECTION 15 BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE
Land use and development planning must support the development and maintenance of
communities with adequate and safe physical and social environments for their residents,
through the appropriate location of uses and development and quality of urban design.
Planning should achieve high quality urban design and architecture that:
- Contributes positively to local urban character and sense of place.
- Reflects the particular characteristics, aspirations and cultural identity of the community.
- Enhances liveability, diversity, amenity and safety of the public realm.
- Promotes attractiveness of towns and cities within broader strategic contexts.
- Minimises detrimental impact on neighbouring properties.
58.04-3 Noise impacts objectives
To contain noise sources in developments that may affect existing dwellings
Clause 21.04 - Objective 3
To reduce potential amenity conflicts between residential and other uses.
Strategy 3.1 Ensure new residential development in the Mixed Use, Business 1, Business 2, and Business 5 Zones and near Industrial and Business Zones is designed to minimise the potential negative amenity impacts of existing non-residential uses in the vicinity.
Clause 15.01-4 Objective
To improve community safety and encourage neighbourhood design that makes people feel safe.
22.07-2 Development Abutting Laneways - Objetcives
1. To provide an environment which has a feeling of safety for users of the laneway.
2. To ensure that development along a laneway acknowledges the unique character of the laneway.
3. To ensure that where development is accessed off a laneway, all services can be provided to the development.
4. To ensure that development along a laneway is provided with safe pedestrian and vehicular access
22.07-3 Development Abutting Laneways - Policy
1. Pedestrian entries be separate from vehicle entries
2. Vehicle access be provided to ensure ingress and egress does not require multiple vehicular movements.
3. Windows and balconies overlook laneways but do not unreasonably overlook private open space or habitable rooms on the opposite side of the laneway.
4. Development respect the scale of the surrounding built form
5. Development not obstruct existing access to other properties in the laneway.
32.04 Mixed Use Zone - Amenity of the neighbourhood
The use of land for an industry, service station or warehouse must not adversely affect the amenity of the neighbourhood, including through:
- The transport of materials or goods to or from the land.
- The appearance of any stored materials or goods.
- Traffic generated by the use.
- Emissions from the land.
2. Neighbourhood character - Public Realm impact
VCAT members have found the concept of a building being a “comfortable companion to the other assets that are characteristic of the area” to be a good guide in evaluating whether something ‘respects’ neighbourhood character. (Judge Gibson)
Plan 2050 does call for an increase in density, but not at the expense of livability. The city of Yarra does support more commercial outcomes. Both the state and local government have policies to retain and enhance what makes Melbourne and Yarra, unique and desirable as we increase density.
Melbourne must retain and enhance its streetscapes, heritage, green open space and livability. Approving a development double the height supported by orderly planning, a single massed tower with no gaps to the sky, total site coverage, with extensive shadowing of the public realm, would establish a nasty precedent for North Fitzroy, Clifton Hill and North Carlton.
42.6 metres is double the height of the tallest buildings in the area. It is more than four times the height of the neighbouring heritage buildings. At 42 metres it is also more than double the height 18-21m, allowed for strategic development sites, and this is _not_ a strategic development site.
The Yarra Planning Scheme, supports “low-rise urban form”, and buildings of up to 5-6 storeys if they are on strategic redevelopment sites or within major activity centres. This site is not an identified strategic development site, it sits on the edge of a neighbourhood activity centre, not a major activity centre.
The proposed building is completely out of scale with the neighbourhood, especially the adjoining heritage buildings. It does not include setbacks on any boundary. This is a new development - it should be setback from the boundary. The proposed height and massing the building does not sit comfortably, respectfully, among its neighbours.
The excessive building height will cause increased shadow to the tiny balcony private open space, as well as reduced natural light to the living rooms, for a number of apartments in the two neighbouring apartment complexes to the east and south of the proposed development.
Shadowing the Street
Nicholson Street will be completely in shadow on both sides of the street through the morning peak hour until the opposite footpath receives its first sunlight by 10am.
Planning Scheme references :
21.05-1 Built Form Heritage - Objective 14
To protect and enhance Yarra's heritage places.
Strategy 14.3 Protect the heritage skyline of heritage precincts.
Strategy 14.6 Protect buildings, streetscapes and precincts of heritage significance from
the visual intrusion of built form both within places and from adjoining areas.
21.05-1 Built Form - Urban Design - Objective 17
To retain Yarra’s identity as a low-rise urban form with pockets of higher development.
Strategy 17.1 Ensure that development outside activity centres and not on Strategic Redevelopment Sites reflects the prevailing low-rise urban form.
Strategy 17.2 Development on strategic redevelopment sites or within activity centres should generally be no more than 5-6 storeys unless it can be demonstrated that the proposal can achieve specific benefits such as :
I.Significant upper level setbacks
II. Architectural design excellence
III. Best practice environmental sustainability objectives in design and construction
IV. High quality restoration and adaptive re-use of heritage buildings
V. Positive contribution to the enhancement of the public domain
VI. Provision of affordable housing
21.05-1 Built Form - Urban Design - Objective 18
To retain, enhance and extend Yarra’s fine grain street pattern.
Strategy 18.1 Encourage the re-establishment of streets and laneways through new development sites where such links were part of the historic street pattern,except where this will cause detrimental traffic impacts.
Strategy 18.2 Enhance the amenity of laneways by applying the Development Abutting Laneway policy at Clause 22.07.
Clause 55.02-1 Objectives
To ensure that the design respects the existing neighbourhood character or contributes to a preferred
The design response must be appropriate to the neighbourhood and the site.
The proposed design must respect the existing or preferred neighbourhood character and respond
to the features of the site.
Gasworks Decision Is In
Major Improvement on Original Proposal
10 Storey Maximum - 20% Affordable Housing
The Minister's decision on the Gasworks site is "in". Mr Richard Wynne has announced a positive Gasworks outcome for the community. It includes a 10 storey maximum height. 20% affordable/social housing, a new combined Year 11&12 campus for Collingwood College and Fitzroy High, and an indoor sports stadium with community rooms.
The Development Victoria Project page Updated to reflect Minister Richard Wynne's decision is here http://www.development.vic.gov.au/projects/fitzroy
Collingwood and Fitzroy combine classes to offer The full range of VCE/VCAL Year 11 & 12 curriculum, but this currently means students often travel to classes at both campuses, on the same day. Having all classes on the same campus means more time learning and less time travelling, as well as freeing up space at Fitzroy and Collingwood for more students.
The community should be proud that their efforts appear to have had a very significant effect.
5 Storey street wall maximum along Smith St, 6 along Queens Parade and George St with 10 storey street wall permitted only along Alexander Parade.
There are also provisions, in line with community concerns and expert advice, to provide for sight lines through the site, a more human-scale experience within the site, break-up of outline in more distant views, and so on.
Issues with car parking provision have been taken on board, bike parking is now 2 spaces. Dwelling, sustainability and housing diversity are now more explicit in the controls. Parking, water, waste are required to be planned in an integrated way across the whole site etc.
It's an example of people getting involved in an official process and getting a much more positive outcome than was originally floated. Props to the panel members for being fair and thorough, and to the decision-maker(s) for taking broader concerns into account.
One thing a bit "hmm" is the section on social and affordable housing. The panel recommended this be a minimum of 15% in the control - agreed to by Yarra and DV. However, in the gazetted control the phrasing is "up to 20%", which seems odd, so is possibly a drafting error.
You can click thru to the approved planning controls downloaded here.
Finally It Over !!
26 - 56 Queens Parade
Final VCAT Decision Published
The bottom line is that Gurner gets a permit to build at the maximum of 10 storeys stated in the DDO, but with a massing and footprint that's been vastly scaled back at each stage of the process.
The original plans were massive and bulky at 16 storeys and 476 apartments. The plans now stand at 10 storeys and 263 apartments (and if you read the tribunal's finding, are likely to reduce a little further). So, a bit over half the original size.
But there's more - heritage that would have been destroyed is now to be protected. Along the way the original architects were ditched and the whole thing redesigned. The apartments must now be more liveable. The residents will now have much better open space.
That couldn't have happened without the efforts of the same amazing community that also put up such a good showing at the Gasworks panel hearing. I'm in awe of you all, and no poor thanks of mine would ever be adequate.
Here is the link to the final decision made this July 2018 - nearly 2 years after the original plans were advertised.
This was a really long haul for us all. The VCAT members were extremely thorough for their part - including returning to site one last time to "fact-check". If you read the decision you'll see what I meant in my earlier post that calling this hearing was something of an "own goal" for the applicant.
Aside from a stellar community effort, Yarra Council, the councillors and the council officers really put in the big ones on this. Kudos to them.
For all of those who contributed just know that this case has had lasting effects beyond our area - other community groups with their own mountains to climb learn from each other's example, including ours.
You've certainly made a difference. Thanks again.
Community Town Hall Meeting
Well Done to the over 200 community members who attended and contributed so generously.
The meeting covered the Development Victoria proposal, the workshopped a bunch of excellent resolutions from the community.
These community resolutions formed the centrepiece of the Protect Fitzroy North submission and presentation to the Advisory Committee Public Hearing.
The former Fitzroy Gasworks is the largest development site in Fitzroy North/Clifton Hill, and represents the last opportunity to introduce major new public infrastructure to our community.
The Gasworks development, on its own, will increase the population of North Fitzroy by 14%, (Needs Analysis).
This is a once in a generation opportunity for the state government to deliver an exemplar in this community, after rejecting this high density horror.
City Of Yarra Officer for Gasworks : Michael.Ballock@yarracity.vic.gov.au
Heaps More Information : Click thru to the PFN GASWORKS Page
26-56 Queens Parade - New Plans
Gurner’s fourth complete set of revised plans for 26-25 Queens Parade has been reviewed by council.
Protect Fitzroy North as an organisation, as well as a number of residents have made submissions.
Link to the (frankly brilliant) council officers submission to VCAT on the March 2018 plans.
The developer's lawyers want a hearing to try and get the council's conditions watered down.
Link to the Council Webpage for 26-56 Queens Parade Plans - All four sets, including March 2018
A link to the VCAT Decision which rejects the development unless a number of changes are made is next. The list of required changes is on pages 44-46, from paragraph 207 onwards.
Transdev/PTV Toxic SprayBooth
Patsy and the No Toxins crew - Won !! - Transdev withdrew their plans for the spray booth on Scotchmer St. Many thanks to all who put in objections, displayed the poster, the councillors and council officers. It is a big relief for all the residents near Nicholson Village.
Piedemontes - Update
** Plans have been rumoured Withdrawn **
The hundreds of objections and the petition to protest the acquisition have been taken on board by the Piedemontes family.
Aquiring a laneway relied on by a number of people and businesses is difficult.
Rumour has it the Piedemontes Family is withdrawing.
This has not been confirmed officially so cannot be relied upon - apologies for previous post.
The resident's group front and centre on ensuring the community's views are respected are Fitzroy North Residents Action Group.
This group includes a strong presence of the residents who live in the streets around Piedemontes.
Works Commencing March 5th - Information Sessions Scheduled
Email Update from Melbourne Water on the M41 Pipeline Page (link above)
Official Melbourne Water Page https://yoursay.melbournewater.com.au/m41
** Piedimontes Update **
520 Objections !!
Wow over 500 objections is a mighty statement on the proposed plans from the community.
Permit number: PLN17/068
Sat 25th - Ward Meeting - Level 2 - New Library
Fabulous turn out of residents at very short notice to the Ward Meeting at the new library.
The new library name was living up to its name as our ward Councillors explained Bargoonga Nganjin means ‘Gather Everybody’ in Woiwurrung, the language of the Wurundjeri people, as part of opening the meeting.
The hot topic was planning and the Piedimonte's proposal.
Sam and Joe Piedimonte spoke of their family's journey with the community for over 50 years
The community members expressed how much they loved shopping at their supermarket, and how devastated they would be to loose the local village shopping experience.
The residents, including many local architects, expressed very strong reservations about key aspects of the design, in detail.
Sam, Joe and the expert residents started a dialogue on how the expansion could be re-imagined to still keep what the community loves about Piedimontes and the North Fitzroy village, the neighbouring residents amenity is respected, while ensuring the supermarket business has a solid platform to thrive for many years to come.
Jackie Fristacky asked for a big thank-you to be passed on to all the community who attended, and an extra thank-you to all those who helped with the set up, then stayed and put the room back to is normal layout.
** VCAT - Interim Decision - April **
VCAT has agreed to the developer's time frame to submit new plans - They are now due 28th February.
The council and the residents will get 4 weeks to review the new plans with accompanying list of changes.
VCAT may schedule a short hearing to allow parties to be heard - only on the changes - in early April
My 2c says this will happen because the mandated design changes are significant.
Apologies for the formal wording in this news entry - but the VCAT case is not yet decided.
VCAT have handed down a decision - but an interim decision rather than a final decision.
This means that in the judgement of the VCAT members :
There are significant issues with the developer's plans presented at the VCAT hearing that can't be addressed through permit conditions.
.. but ..
Those issues are not so great as to require a complete transformation in order to reach an acceptable outcome.
Therefore the applicant - Gurner(tm) is invited to submit a further set of plans, addressing the issues identified by VCAT.
Gurner(tm) has elected to submit revised plans by the end of February, the time for parties to VCAT ( residents and council), to review those plans has not been announced.
The further hearing on the compliance of revised plans to the VCAT interim order has not been scheduled.
If the developer's plans meet the letter of the requested design changes - but as a whole still do not constitute an acceptable outcome - the plans can stillbe refused by VCAT.
The VCAT interim decision is nearly 50 pages long.
Click on the Link To VCAT Decision button below to see the full decision text.
Gurner(tm) have until the 13th November to notify the Tribunal they will prepare amended plans in accordance with
the changes in the order, along with the date the plans will be ready.
We'll have more to say as the story continues to unfold
The following extract is paragraph 17 titled Main Finding in the Interim Decision.
Our main finding is that although the scheme supports a substantial
development of the main site and a small but relatively intense development
of the rear site, the plans for each site are not a satisfactory response to the
relevant provisions of the scheme. Changes to the design response for both
sites are necessary. We are unable to frame appropriate conditions for a
permit for either site because of the nature of the changes. We
acknowledge the validity of the underlying design thesis and we are
therefore prepared to give the applicant an opportunity to prepare further
amendments to the plans for both sites.
Extra big thank-you to Chris Sanders and Marion Marshall
Chris Sanders of Zen Folio photography http://christophersanders.zenfolio.com/, produced a range of brilliant pictures on a tight deadline to illustrate our case.
Marion Marshall, of Marion Marshall Studios http://www.marionmarshallstudios.com.au/, curated our wonderful book of images, referenced by the Protect Fitzroy North presenters.
Both Chris and Marion stepped up to produce just what was needed, to a really tight deadline, without any fuss at all, so thank-you for adding such a professional finish to our presentations.
The Panel acknowledged the strong community presence across the full 10 days of the completed hearing.
We are not expecting for a decision to be handed down before the end of October.
A Massive Thank-You to all who attended.
OUR COUNCIL HAS PRESENTED BRILLIANTLY
Our Resident presentations all went VERY weLL
Submissions were presented to the panel on Parking, Traffic, Planning, Heritage, Amenity, Neighbourhood Character, Net Community Benefit and Urban Design.
Here is a small sample of the 23 page Submission prepared and presented by the Neighbourhood Character Think Tank
The lack of empathy of the development proposal for the existing or preferred neighbourhood character demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of, and a lack of empathy for, the existing community in North Fitzroy.
It is an outward-facing neighbourhood, with a genuine and strong sense of openness and community that has a long history of banding together.
The residents of North Fitzroy generally enjoy small private open spaces, but are afforded the luxury of large, accommodating and welcoming public open spaces and it is in those public open spaces that locals relax, walk their dogs or congregate with their friends in the neighbourhood and visitors from all over Melbourne.
North Fitzroy is a neighbourhood rich in human interaction that has a true spirit of place, where a diverse range of people come together to engage in all manner of activities.
The design of the development is inherently inwards looking.
In particular, the townhouses around parts of the boundary of the site open inwards rather than onto the street.
This is in sharp contrast to the neighbourhood more generally, where houses have small front yards and generally present an open face to others who live in and visit the area.
We query where the opportunities are for residents of this development to interact “by chance” with their community, in the context of a design that offers little in the way of interaction with the wider community.
Other than a small section of the Queens Parade edge of the development, close to the commercial premises, it is closed to all but those who live there, and will present a blank face to the broader community in which it sits.
When our community stANDS as one we Are mighty
New Plans - New Architect - Same Problem
** STILL TOO BIG ** Our Councillors agree **
Newsflash from IDAC - Yarra councillors unanimously to_reject_ the revised plans for 26-56 Queens Parade.
A Massive Thank-you to each and every one who made the treck to Richmond Town Hall.
It was a marathon sitting, and the developer was there to see the communities commitment in person.
Yarra council to stand shoulder to shoulder with residents at VCAT. It's worth noting and commending the amazing focus the Yarra councillors have given appropriate development of this precinct - a series of council actions and votes have occurred to get us to this point and at every single one the councillors have supported and worked hard for their community.
Thanks particularly to Councillors Misha Coleman, Danae Bosler and Daniel Nguyen for officiating at a particularly challenging IDAC meeting.
Councillors, council officers and residents alike all had the stresses of shortened timeframes to meet the VCAT schedule. On the upside, there is now sufficient time between now and VCAT for Yarra to prepare an effective case.
Community concern has been been expressed in the heartfelt efforts of over 470 objectors.
Over 98 paid up personally to stand before VCAT in support of retaining neighbourhood character and amenity.
The picture below is the South Elevation from the plans supplied to VCAT. A red line is added to highlight the outline of the whole building proposed, as only the front section of three of the towers has been drawn in with any detail.
The link to the VCAT Substituted Plans July 2017 are on the council website, link is below.
When our community stands as one we are Mighty
Why are we fighting this again ?
In 2003, an independent panel of top planning experts from Panels Victoria, thoroughly reviewed a development application on this site, and approved the 172 apartment, 5 storey solution submitted by the owner.
Now after 13 years of doing nothing the same owner is back, with a new developer, and a new totally inappropriate application.
Why do reasonable residents who have been through it once, have to go through it again?
Put yourself in our position, think of the hassle of the first time around, think why is it on again ?
Why, because the fight is worth having, because Fitzroy North is worth protecting.
Our Facebook group is Protect Fitzroy North, our Twitter feed is @ProtectFitzNth #TooBig2ignore
Our Contact Page is a click away in the Menu above, it sends your message to firstname.lastname@example.org
Our Postal Address is Protect Fitzroy North Inc.
PO Box 1076, Fitzroy North, Vic 3068.
Videos of the speakers at our Public Meeting, including Professor Michael Buxton, are on our youtube page https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCbwtdjdEHRAGIGM9C3omAw
A response to some ill informed comment in The Age, The Australian, The Australian Financial Review, and various developement industry media is in Response To Opinion under the In The News page in the menu above
FRIENDS AND SUPPORTERS
The Lord Newry Hotel 243 Brunswick Street, North Fitzroy http://www.lordnewryhotel.com.au/
North Fitzroy Arms Hotel 296 Rae St, Fitzroy North http://www.northfitzroyarms.com.au/